Findings from the blog
By the longer address the issue of plagiarism and writing the blog, a feeling confirmed, which was, at the beginning: The issue is very big and diverse. However, many findings
could be obtained, which are set out in the blog. This resulted in a certain overview and a rudimentary procedure. But the topic as a whole was only scratched. But the theme aspects that were mentioned in the first blog , could all be discussed, showing that the local assessment of the effort was realistic.
A textual summary of what issues have been raised in the blog is not attempted because it would be a shame, content for reducing to a few sentences, especially since they are already written in the blog in a very short form. There would be for each entry to write more.
The cost, which the Find of the subject and the subsequent cost of writing blog was great. This is especially in comparison to the written text, since it seems that would have for the time spent more text can result. Total
has been worth the writing, as this will have read, heard or seen again had to be reflected to them shortly and hopefully write concise.
A drawback of the structured Blog writing is the fact that some interesting facts, examples and anecdotes had to be omitted because they had no direct relation to the individual websites, and the reader would still have been interesting. But part of the letter is indeed the art of omission.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Monday, April 6, 2009
Duofem And Ferrous Fumarate Tableta
problems of plagiarism detection software by
The detection rate of plagiarism detection software is under Weber-Wulff often only about 50 percent. There are several reasons to be mentioned here briefly.
A central problem is that a program can only detect plagiarism when it has access to the original text. Off-line, with a Database work, which is not connected to the Internet, have a very limited selection of original texts and discover why many do not plagiarism. Online programs in this respect are of course much better. Nevertheless, the possibilities of such programs is limited because they do not have access to sources such as books or magazines as long as they are not digitized and accessible. Especially books are still popular sources for plagiarists. Each program is therefore only as good as its Zugriffsmöglickeiten to sources.
Another problem of plagiarism detection programs are translations. If a foreign-language text translated and plagiarized, this may no program To discover there is a translation of a complex operation for such a program.
A further difficulty for users of plagiarism detection software are called false positives. These are places provided by the program called plagiarism, but in fact are the author's own work. Therefore need details of plagiarism programs are always checked before the potential plagiarist is confronted with it, as it may cause very embarrassing scenes.
Another point that must be considered in the use of plagiarism detection programs is the confidence. To verify such a school all the work of their students through a software for plagiarism does this action actually shows that the school does not trust their students generally. Whether such an implied statement is good for the school climate, the reader must decide for themselves.
programs to detect plagiarism in general have still a considerable need for improvement and perhaps even negative social implications, yet they are in great demand. This shows that despite all the problems, a need. If this demand was caused by the possibilities of the Internet or by changing use of media and content can not answer this blog.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXqL7QlUCL-H0Rma0w29MD0_1rDGYSFWrMyrGCoNFN1QdTh5BY0scsPoBpoJU9JIdjyh3Uae6HKzWgYKREO5mwWmc4ACB3qcXIH5BOWuKACSeUwch-dWb968mb3ZDbN4C9GQLLgFJMgeY/s200/plagiat.jpg)
The detection rate of plagiarism detection software is under Weber-Wulff often only about 50 percent. There are several reasons to be mentioned here briefly.
A central problem is that a program can only detect plagiarism when it has access to the original text. Off-line, with a Database work, which is not connected to the Internet, have a very limited selection of original texts and discover why many do not plagiarism. Online programs in this respect are of course much better. Nevertheless, the possibilities of such programs is limited because they do not have access to sources such as books or magazines as long as they are not digitized and accessible. Especially books are still popular sources for plagiarists. Each program is therefore only as good as its Zugriffsmöglickeiten to sources.
Another problem of plagiarism detection programs are translations. If a foreign-language text translated and plagiarized, this may no program To discover there is a translation of a complex operation for such a program.
A further difficulty for users of plagiarism detection software are called false positives. These are places provided by the program called plagiarism, but in fact are the author's own work. Therefore need details of plagiarism programs are always checked before the potential plagiarist is confronted with it, as it may cause very embarrassing scenes.
Another point that must be considered in the use of plagiarism detection programs is the confidence. To verify such a school all the work of their students through a software for plagiarism does this action actually shows that the school does not trust their students generally. Whether such an implied statement is good for the school climate, the reader must decide for themselves.
programs to detect plagiarism in general have still a considerable need for improvement and perhaps even negative social implications, yet they are in great demand. This shows that despite all the problems, a need. If this demand was caused by the possibilities of the Internet or by changing use of media and content can not answer this blog.
The Offisial Blog Of Pinky
software for plagiarism detection
After the last blog with the negative effects of Internet plagiarism has occupied and potential counterfeiters, will this blog deal with new programs for plagiarism detection, which arose mainly because of the Internet. discover
One of the simplest, yet most effective methods of plagiarism is Google . In the search engine a particular combination of words, a sentence or paragraph of text to be examined from a work is entered, the unusual, or otherwise special. This is usually sufficient to detect the template for plagiarism and is free. This simple method is advocated by experts .
There are also several free Internet in addition to Google services that are have specialized in the detection of plagiarism. For example, there Copyscape or PlagiarismDetect , looking for two free programs to check for plagiarism. The free programs are usually programmed by interested private individuals and then shared with other users. Nevertheless, they are not necessarily worse than programs to pay for the use you.
Examples of commercial programs Docoloc or Turnitin be mentioned. These programs are often used by institutions such as schools or universities. They are often very easy to use, deal with it, even nontechnical users with it. The quality of their results is similar as those of the free programs.
Unfortunately, the quality of the results in general a problem of plagiarism detection programs. According to Weber-Wulff find these programs in most cases only about half the places in a plagiarized work. The reasons for this poor rate of detection are discussed in the next blog. seduced
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGF1oW9ksB9Et5xlQuC3cNPpK4BS4c85z8hjgbVAhH-YDD8Afx-bviXvwmFQzSmfoDQ2uS4WUOfGFPEisSCmAUBC-tmFosb-476OHScQmozKop7jjoENRDtKmedGDSPrPAiQr3R78k-Vg/s320/Software.jpg)
After the last blog with the negative effects of Internet plagiarism has occupied and potential counterfeiters, will this blog deal with new programs for plagiarism detection, which arose mainly because of the Internet. discover
One of the simplest, yet most effective methods of plagiarism is Google . In the search engine a particular combination of words, a sentence or paragraph of text to be examined from a work is entered, the unusual, or otherwise special. This is usually sufficient to detect the template for plagiarism and is free. This simple method is advocated by experts .
There are also several free Internet in addition to Google services that are have specialized in the detection of plagiarism. For example, there Copyscape or PlagiarismDetect , looking for two free programs to check for plagiarism. The free programs are usually programmed by interested private individuals and then shared with other users. Nevertheless, they are not necessarily worse than programs to pay for the use you.
Examples of commercial programs Docoloc or Turnitin be mentioned. These programs are often used by institutions such as schools or universities. They are often very easy to use, deal with it, even nontechnical users with it. The quality of their results is similar as those of the free programs.
Unfortunately, the quality of the results in general a problem of plagiarism detection programs. According to Weber-Wulff find these programs in most cases only about half the places in a plagiarized work. The reasons for this poor rate of detection are discussed in the next blog. seduced
Black Hair Dye With Blue Highlights
impact of the Internet for plagiarism
about the reasons, the counterfeiters with their doings, was written in the last blog. Now we will show how writers can find thanks Google and other search engines in few seconds of material amounting to thousands of pages on any topic. This fact tempts some people to take themselves to writing a paper to write in patchwork plagiarism procedures. The quality of the material varies greatly, of course, but it would be fast enough documentation to write a speech or even a written work.
to work on this way was through the many sources available on the Internet much easier. Where once thinned out laboriously library catalogs for suitable books had on other borrowed books had to be maintained or waived and will be typed to accepting texts had enough, now a few mouse clicks and you have created a counterfeit. Also
Wikipedia led many users to take raw information, the local equivalent, as information processed on any topic available and understandable.
Furthermore over the Internet databases such as Hausaufgabe.de or e-Hausaufgaben.de be achieved that are plagiierende students have a gold mine, because there work, presentations and lectures on any subject in almost each level are available. This allure of such a database the user to plagiarize correctly as possible.
The Internet makes life easier for potential counterfeiters, because there are so many ways easy-to-find copy-material. But through the Internet, new methods to detect plagiarism have emerged that are discussed in the next blog.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-a1JTeY8gU6VmL7NIO7ZV_X6eodAbaU_SyXJg8qAx3H9DE2v_1OY6QY1jCQjpmMpKQy_P7NVZAidRX87T5gVqCYjSu1uKwLKLoR03ZbkV54wxrdz8ujr_MzdqE8szTB21nkeM7qtOSv4/s320/Copypaste+Grafik.jpg)
about the reasons, the counterfeiters with their doings, was written in the last blog. Now we will show how writers can find thanks Google and other search engines in few seconds of material amounting to thousands of pages on any topic. This fact tempts some people to take themselves to writing a paper to write in patchwork plagiarism procedures. The quality of the material varies greatly, of course, but it would be fast enough documentation to write a speech or even a written work.
to work on this way was through the many sources available on the Internet much easier. Where once thinned out laboriously library catalogs for suitable books had on other borrowed books had to be maintained or waived and will be typed to accepting texts had enough, now a few mouse clicks and you have created a counterfeit. Also
Wikipedia led many users to take raw information, the local equivalent, as information processed on any topic available and understandable.
Furthermore over the Internet databases such as Hausaufgabe.de or e-Hausaufgaben.de be achieved that are plagiierende students have a gold mine, because there work, presentations and lectures on any subject in almost each level are available. This allure of such a database the user to plagiarize correctly as possible.
The Internet makes life easier for potential counterfeiters, because there are so many ways easy-to-find copy-material. But through the Internet, new methods to detect plagiarism have emerged that are discussed in the next blog.
Lbp Costumes For Sale
reasons for plagiarism?
reasons to write to plagiarism, there is no contact person or, depending on several. The arguments of those who believe that plagiarism had never allowed, are known. Much more interesting are the justifications and excuses of those who write the plagiarism. This will address this entry after the last blog has one of the most common justification was called, the Zitierfehler.
claim often caught pirates, yes, everyone plagiarize. Of course this is an excuse and no justification, is still a grain of truth in the statement. Depending on the survey from twenty to forty percent of all pupils and students have been plagiarized. While these are by no means all, but a large percentage, so that the statement that all plagiarize, although not confirmed, but somewhat understandable impact.
Besides the students there are other groups who write also plagiarism, in part, to a considerable extent.
The fact that, although not all, but plagiarized a not to be underestimated part of the writing person can explain the following justification perhaps. Many people see
plagiarism as a problem or injustice, because they lack a sense of wrongdoing in that direction. This is at least partly from the fact that the internet movies, music and lyrics can often be used free of charge, and that this content is often further processed. This lack of respect for the spiritual power of others and also the respect for intellectual property. Sun Plagiarism is often a result of this careless handling of contents. This fact is often used as a justification of plagiarism that have been discovered.
A statement by the authors of plagiarism is also frequently made, is that the time and pressure to succeed that exists today, they have gertieben to copy works of others.
This is the question of whether the pressure on the individual Person is actually greater today than it was twenty years ago. Unfortunately, this question is not answered here, but the author is skeptical, as even writers were writing in ancient Rome similar complaints.
fact is that large print is to a person of no justification for the writing of plagiarism.
Another reason for plagiarism is according to some people, the fact that all ideas have been there before and considered before, so were all thought anyway, and texts are only plagiarism. Therefore, quoting is unnecessary. This almost philosophical argument but is also more cheap excuse rather than justification.
reasons to write to plagiarism, there is no contact person or, depending on several. The arguments of those who believe that plagiarism had never allowed, are known. Much more interesting are the justifications and excuses of those who write the plagiarism. This will address this entry after the last blog has one of the most common justification was called, the Zitierfehler.
claim often caught pirates, yes, everyone plagiarize. Of course this is an excuse and no justification, is still a grain of truth in the statement. Depending on the survey from twenty to forty percent of all pupils and students have been plagiarized. While these are by no means all, but a large percentage, so that the statement that all plagiarize, although not confirmed, but somewhat understandable impact.
Besides the students there are other groups who write also plagiarism, in part, to a considerable extent.
The fact that, although not all, but plagiarized a not to be underestimated part of the writing person can explain the following justification perhaps. Many people see
plagiarism as a problem or injustice, because they lack a sense of wrongdoing in that direction. This is at least partly from the fact that the internet movies, music and lyrics can often be used free of charge, and that this content is often further processed. This lack of respect for the spiritual power of others and also the respect for intellectual property. Sun Plagiarism is often a result of this careless handling of contents. This fact is often used as a justification of plagiarism that have been discovered.
A statement by the authors of plagiarism is also frequently made, is that the time and pressure to succeed that exists today, they have gertieben to copy works of others.
This is the question of whether the pressure on the individual Person is actually greater today than it was twenty years ago. Unfortunately, this question is not answered here, but the author is skeptical, as even writers were writing in ancient Rome similar complaints.
fact is that large print is to a person of no justification for the writing of plagiarism.
Another reason for plagiarism is according to some people, the fact that all ideas have been there before and considered before, so were all thought anyway, and texts are only plagiarism. Therefore, quoting is unnecessary. This almost philosophical argument but is also more cheap excuse rather than justification.
Friday, April 3, 2009
Pringels Pinhole Amara
Zitierfehler
Having been viewed in the last blog on the Plagiatorengruppen, is discussed here that reason, specify the Palgiatoren caught mostly as a justification for their plagiarism: the Zitierfehler. to use
The only way to other texts in a separate text, the quotation, because of his own text is a plagiarism otherwise. Quote seems obvious, but the Zitierfehler is still used a lot when it comes to justify plagiarism.
is often argued that the plagiarist had cited only wrong or forgot the quote. That a citation was forgotten or deleted during the formatting of the text are quite obvious excuses. But the statement that anyone know the citation was wrongly used, must be considered in more detail.
At first glance it seems simple and easy quote for granted. If anyone has a part of a text literally takes over, he must put quotation marks and indicate the source. It is more difficult but when paraphrasing. There must also be the source noted, but in a paragraph, another author cited several times by paraphrase, the source must then be specified more than once or is it sufficient to mention the other authors at the end of the paragraph? How and when a work is to quote from which only several ideas have been applied, without concrete content has been taken over? The
Citations are not as easy as you think and sometimes are learned in school until relatively late. Therefore, pupils find it and then students are not easy to quote suddenly, after they had not for years.
It pays for a school or university, clear citation to all its members leave, so nobody can claim that he did not know the rules or they would not have been comprehensible to him. Thus, at least a portion of the Zitierfehler be avoided, so that other causes of plagiarism to the fore. These reasons are discussed in the next blog.
Having been viewed in the last blog on the Plagiatorengruppen, is discussed here that reason, specify the Palgiatoren caught mostly as a justification for their plagiarism: the Zitierfehler. to use
The only way to other texts in a separate text, the quotation, because of his own text is a plagiarism otherwise. Quote seems obvious, but the Zitierfehler is still used a lot when it comes to justify plagiarism.
is often argued that the plagiarist had cited only wrong or forgot the quote. That a citation was forgotten or deleted during the formatting of the text are quite obvious excuses. But the statement that anyone know the citation was wrongly used, must be considered in more detail.
At first glance it seems simple and easy quote for granted. If anyone has a part of a text literally takes over, he must put quotation marks and indicate the source. It is more difficult but when paraphrasing. There must also be the source noted, but in a paragraph, another author cited several times by paraphrase, the source must then be specified more than once or is it sufficient to mention the other authors at the end of the paragraph? How and when a work is to quote from which only several ideas have been applied, without concrete content has been taken over? The
Citations are not as easy as you think and sometimes are learned in school until relatively late. Therefore, pupils find it and then students are not easy to quote suddenly, after they had not for years.
It pays for a school or university, clear citation to all its members leave, so nobody can claim that he did not know the rules or they would not have been comprehensible to him. Thus, at least a portion of the Zitierfehler be avoided, so that other causes of plagiarism to the fore. These reasons are discussed in the next blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)