Gum Ulcer After Root Canal

The monkeys race through the forest




Well I know who stole up Leonie. One day we will sing the song together again .....

Free Streaming Auditions

Here I am, however, like a troublemaker .... in the models ...


is Querulanz neither mental illness nor a the business, process or accountability touching condition, but the persistent criticism and fearless opposition against any excessive increase or grievances, usually very intelligent and sensitive man, indeed often and escalating to excess.


"troublemaker" for instance, was Michael Kohlhaas, "troublemakers" were also Luther, Voltaire, Galileo and Giordano Bruno, Fritz Reuter, Heinrich Mann "Troublemakers" are Martin Niemoller, Sakharov and Solchenizyn.


If there were no troublemakers, the world would be poorer. This is also our state, to give the general querulousness can do, especially the many small, government and judiciary severely annoying troublemakers. Only if there are complaints against the state itself by its own decisions, his own practice to be reviewed, then his liberality, his legal understanding of the state to the end, he emerges suddenly as a legitimate successor to the Prussian state in which querulousness punishable stood (Prussian Court Rules of 1795).

Mexicana Famosas Follando

Administrative Court Münster: action against the youth of Muenster


Tuesday, 8 March 2011, 11 clock, Hall II, Room 5, Pius Allee 38, 48147 Münster:

Negotiations are on an appeal against the youth office of Munster. This has been communicated to me today as assist a mother from Münster.

on the appointment should I prepare myself like this: bring the charge. The directions note. Remember that there is before the court only a few parking spaces. The Regional Association of Westphalia-Lippe contrast, have sufficient parking space.

I come by train, but not allowed to take knives, scissors, batons, brass knuckles and the like. Permits are well: hand grenades, machine guns, Machine guns and the like.

But all that is movable thing, comes in a fluoroscopy unit, I would barter may still trouble, because someone could come up with the idea that such things also represent a certain danger.

Event details will be released, hardly a representative of the Youth Office of Munster. That would have problems if he should bring along: the Constitution, the Children and Youth Protection Act, which FamFG, the social legislation, etc. If the authority conferred or straight - do not exist?

show is a representative of the Legal Office of the City of Münster. He has also already written information the Youth Office to the Administrative Court of Münster forwarded. This included a table that have been thrown in the data so confused that one of two surviving children is evidence from the authorities point of view not yet been born ...

a contribution for http://kinderunwohl.blogspot.com />

Fun Things To Write In A Wedding Guest Book

abuse can take place at several levels. eg: Sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse including abuse means always having a superior person (eg, adult), his superiority, confidence, ignorance and dependence on the losing person exploited for its own purposes. Sexual, emotional and physical abuse can lead to a variety of short-and long-term consequences and damages. Many patients remain influenced their lives and burdened by abuse experiences.

And I would immediately call a lot of people I terminate a life sentence behind bars would allow them to abuse a child torture and more. Forgot

Groping On Trains Movies

Thanks ....... ....


in coexistence with our fellow human beings, we often find that every life ends one day and that we do not know when that will be that day. So get the people you love and you care to, say, that they are special and important. Tell them, before it is too late. Remember, you reap what you sow. What one brings to the lives of others comes back into his own life also. Therefore I say here and now, thank you and this is for all the Leonie not forget all the posts at my side. Since there are more accessible, I will only mention a few representative for all by name ... Leonie I thank you for everything you have given me and I promise not to disappoint your confidence from. Which we can not reach the water ... About the sun and laughs about it ....

Thanks to that part of my family support me and the support I can ...

Thanks to all my friends ... A very special thanks to Michael, Fiete, Jacqueline, Christina, Ines and Ulla .....

Final Fantasy Dawn Of Souls Gameshark Cheats

sued 18-year-old youth office


damages for pain and suffering and required training in psychiatry

Usually, this is probably one of the rules, who writes the normal life, young people desire to one day see the parents. Niko F. (real name) complains that a completely different, to have his way in the adult world had made it difficult: the circle youth welfare office Amberg-Sulzbach. The now 18-year-old calls by an official action for damages before the Regional Court of Amberg pain and suffering damages in the order of almost 80 000 € one.

was held on Thursday largely closed to the public of the start of the trial before the 1st Civil Chamber, chaired by Gerd Dressler instead. In a very tense atmosphere in the audience. Many and partially exposed emotions are in play. As requested by the Authority in 2007 the then 15-year-old had been separated from his mother for several weeks and months, starting in the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Erlangen and later admitted in a youth home.

Earlier, can escape the circle youth welfare office of the single mother of Niko F. in part the right of education. It approved at that time that her son - because of the reasons - continued Bullying in its class not attended secondary school. The mother argued against the concerned teachers persistent panic attacks, the 15-year-olds. The school board turned the circle youth welfare office, things took their course. Only about nine months later, Niko F. was home again, a decent school, he no longer managed.

http://www.oberpfalznetz.de/onetz/2669997-100, 1.0 html

Does Dvr Count In Viewing Figures

liability of the youth office ....


press release. 21.10.2004 - Federal Court (BGH) No 120/2004

Federal Court to liability of the youth department at abuse of foster children by foster parents

including the legal liability for the office responsible III. Civil Division of the Federal Supreme Court in a compensation process of a foster child against a Baden-Württemberg District (youth office) because during the stay in a foster family suffered ill-treatment by the lower courts (District Court and Court of Appeal of Stuttgart) outspoken condemnation of the defendant for payment of damages (25 000 €) and a finding of liability on account of all material and confirmed future intangible damages to the plaintiff.

Beck News: Supreme Court: Youth Welfare Office has compensation for ill treatment of child care by foster parents pay

mishandling foster parents, her protege, then the Office for Youth on damages to be claimed, if the authority is in breach of supervisory and control duties. Here are the mistreated burden of proof regarding benefit of such breaches of causality. This is from a ruling by the Federal Court out of 21.10.2004, which ascribes to a now 15-year EUR 25,000 for pain and suffering (Az: III ZR 254/03).

violated duty of monitoring

After the verdict, the Baden-Wuerttemberg Rems-Murr-Kreis as the support of the defendant Youth Office to the applicant all the material and immaterial damages resulting from the abuse substitute its foster parents. Led to the creation of the judges, have the youth office its duty under § 37 Paragraph 3, sentence 1 SGB VIII to a "courtesy call" injured in the foster family, as they had moved from Bavaria to Baden-Württemberg. The mission was due to remain under the jurisdiction of courts. ........


The verdict of the lower court: OLG Stuttgart, official misconduct of youth services institution with mistreatment of the foster child, NJW 2003, 3419

discussion of the lower courts of that judgment: Meysen, death in the foster family: violation of inspection requirements in the youth ministry? NJW 2003, 3369

Bringewat, municipal youth welfare and criminal liability guarantee, NJW 1998, 944

The decision is now available as full text (pdf file, 70 kB).

http://books.google.at/books?id=17RvHWqhlfMC&pg=PA358&lpg=PA358&dq=Verurteilung+Jugendamt+Schadenersatz&source=bl&ots=l3b1DchyEw&sig=IHv8C_RHPl9P-U6_voY7VmOU4f0&hl=de&ei=7qdwTaLCNJHbsgburs2gCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CC4Q6AEwBg # v = onepage & q & f = false

Calories In Brocaal White Pizza

Haunersche Children's Hospital diagnosed falsely abuse of a girl: Parents sue successfully


By Ekkehard Müller-Jentsch

Haunersche The Children's Hospital is sentenced to a Munich family to pay damages and compensation. Because the district court of Munich in the hearing on Wednesday no Doubt left - the formal verdict will also be announced until Thursday. Because of the sentence: The child protection group of the University Hospital mistakenly thought he was a child abuse on the track and he apparently overreacted - an intact family was affected by very heavy.

In February 2006, then four and a half year old girl was brought with thick swollen black eye and a slight concussion in the Hospital of Third Order. The little girl had fallen while playing against an open door, the parents said the doctors. After an outpatient treatment, the mother gave her daughter a few days back in the kindergarten. A coincidence that present Social worker of the youth office saw the battered girl, prompting questions that the child was taken to hospital observation in the Haunersche Children's Hospital.

There was recently a child protection group has been established. Immediately there entered a "helper conference" composed of physicians, social workers and psychologists. She came to the conclusion that the parents quickly removed from the custody and the child must be placed in a home. Because the Commission had become aware that these small about five months earlier fallen out of a window on the first floor of the apartment, but without suffering permanent damage.

But about a month later, the same legal medical examiner, which had insured the beginning of the child protection group that the child must have been hurt by punches, what they wanted to have recognized in photos, now the opposite fixed: In cooperation with the boss, Professor Wolfgang Eisenmenger, they now came to the conclusion that it really no evidence of mistreatment admit. The criminal investigation was immediately stopped and returned the child of the family.

For the whole of the events completely surprised parents, is an economically well-off Turkish couple with three children, was then broken down her heal up to that world - the family structure was very upset at times a very dramatic way. Later, the parents raised the District Court of Munich lawsuit filed by more than 20 000 € against the university hospital. The judges of the 9th Civil court could examine the entire process by an expert.

And now came to the conclusion that despite the good will, no doubt by the clinic team was "made so many mistakes" were that he also "appalled" was. "I am a father of nine children," said the expert. "If were created in all its age-related injuries such standards would, one would also have to withdraw my custody," he explained vividly his assessment. The lawyer for the clinic assured that all the time very Participate sorry for doing what the family had been done-for those days, they had believed, however, to do the right thing.

The court explained that the action would take the family to give, and in the required amount. Whether the clinic to appeal against appeal is still open. (Comment)

01/08/2009

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/159386/904/2704265/Gutachter-ist-entsetzt-ueber-so-viele-Fehler.html

Sample Vote Of Thanks For Weddings

liability of a guardian's office and others ..... for breach of fiduciary duty


The granting of the statutory rights of access is a violation of law, according to the care and education requirement dar. So the boycott of a guardian is over a non-parental care in § 171 StGB (penal code) also determined and is punishable:

§ 171 breach of care or education required

Who his care or education required grossly against a person under sixteen years of hurt and thus brings the wards in the danger to his physical or mental development to be significantly damaged, [..] is punishable by imprisonment up to three years or a fine.

objective of this legal norm, that child injurious behaviors of persons who are committed to the custody may also be punished. These costs may fall as well as behavior which, for example, failure to Include assistance.

The § 235 StGB (Criminal Code) goes further:

§ 235 Child Stealing

(1) A prison sentence is punishable up to five years or a fine, who first

a person under eighteen years of age by force, threat of appreciable harm or by fraud or

second a child to be without their relatives, parents, a parent, guardian or caregiver withdraws or withholds.

third a child to be without their relatives, parents, a parent, guardian or caregiver withdraws or withholds.

Of this also covers detected beyond where his guardian, the non-parental care specifically the rights of access.

following Supreme Court decisions of the Federal Court to be known:

1.BGH, Judgement of 23.6.1993 - 3 StR 89/93
2.BGH, Judgement of 11.02.1999 - 4 StR 594/98
3.BGH, Judgement from 09.02.2006 - 5 StR 564/05

In the "grandparent case" would be as such to render assistance and child abduction the official misconduct of the official guardian by - despite knowledge of the behavior problems in child and adolescent psychiatry, and despite knowledge of a burning desire see the child's grandparents to do - has done nothing to protect the child from further to protect physical and psychological threats and comply with its express desire to see his grandparents.

Because - must be considered as it has, the official guardian nothing about it that the child is in child and adolescent psychiatry in terms of its psychological needs regular contact with his grandparents.

According to experts it is very well understood that the permanent withdrawal of treatment in this case led to a very serious psychological distress in this child and the occurring aggression and other behavioral problems could thus be attributed to the fact. These assumptions of the experts based in particular on the fact that in the period when the grandchild has lived with his grandparents, that is, from his first to the age of six no extreme aggression outbreaks have occurred, which have a shipment of child psychiatry can be necessary.

Does the guardian's transactions improperly and damage occur as a result, this triggers compensation obligations. Liability claims are directed against the Authority (Youth Board).

For breaches of the minor are used as bases for claims, both public liability claims under § 839 BGB in conjunction with Article 34 GG and state liability claims according to § 1 para 1 StHG and claims under the terms of the guardian's liability provisions of § 1833 BGB considered.

Dispatched by the breach of duty claims of third parties, a pure
public liability claim may be considered. In cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct, the Authority may rely on individual employees or individual employee.
The legal advisor shall be liable for intentionally and negligently caused damage in their care if this is a breach of duty (§ 1833 BGB in conjunction with § 1908i para 1 BGB).

Come by failing in a ward of the guardian is liable to damage the guardian:
damage can also be caused by omission more necessary actions. Damage caused by neglect can lead to liability if the supervisor would have to act to protect their care.

An approval of the guardianship court is no exemption from liability for damages. The supervisor is also responsible for the legality of his actions. See on BGH, decision, 18.9.2003.

decision of the AG Essen regarding the compensation requirement as a mother umgangsboykottierenden published



(FamRZ 2008, 717):



No. 380 AmtsG Eating - BGB § § 823 I, 1684, 253

(Case v. 5.6 2007 - 18 C 216/04)

first For the compensation obligation of the custodial parent for failure to grant the handling.

second Handling frustration due regularly no pain and suffering claim.

(Summary from the editor)



The class and the defendant are divorced spouses. From the marriage are the children K., born 1993, and I, born 1995, was formed. The children live with the mother, the defendant, who is solely responsible for them.

By order of the FAMG E. v. 12.20.2002 between the parties to regulate its handling was hit with the kids. ...

accordance with the resolution of the class had a deal with the children of 7 be held until 09/05/2004. . . . The class was looking forward to being with the kids this weekend, as I for the first time in many years, had her birthday with her father and to celebrate.

had this reason the class organized a weekend getaway, where he wanted to celebrate with his children's birthday I.. Here was the IG. - Common ground - incurred for renting a holiday home, an amount in the amount of 180 €.

On 07/05/2004 the class appeared to 14 clock at the residence of the defendant and rang there to pick the children up for this weekend. Here, the class was not opened. On Saturday and Sunday class also tried in vain to to reach the defendant at her apartment to take the children to handle the weekend. Here, the transfer of the children in the class ultimately failed because the defendant, together with the kids wanted to celebrate the birthday of I., which was done.

In these proceedings the class requested by the defendant for damages in the amount of 180 € in vain because of the costs incurred for renting a holiday home on the weekend 7th until 05.09.2004 for dealing with the children.

Furthermore, the class requested by the defendant for damages for non-pecuniary damage because of frustration of dealing with the children at the birthday party of the daughter I on 09/05/2004 in the amount of 3,000 €. ... The defendant claims:

The child I have the birthday weekend v. 7 want to spend up to 09/05/2004 at home with the defendant. When the class had made it clear, that on the seventh weekend with the children there until 05/09/2004, they have - the defendant - again with the daughter I talked to them change their minds. But I cried and I want to celebrate her birthday, despite all persuasion with her mother and sister. ...

from the grounds of:

The action is only partly justified.

The class of the defendant can pay a sum in the amount of 180 € in damages because of the costs spent in vain in the amount of 180 € for the rental of a house Weekend 7th 09/05/2004 foiled because of the demand to deal with the children on the basis of § 823 I BGB in conjunction with the rights under § 1684 BGB. The rights of a parent under § 1684 I BGB is an "absolute right" within the meaning of § 823 I BGB, so that the violation or obstruction to claims for compensation. This follows the Court of the newer literature mainly expressed in the comment view.

The defendant has violated this absolute right of § 823 I BGB fact that the handling of the class with their children on weekends 7th has not approved until 05/09/2004 and prevents, even though the class after that date valid order of the program due to a right state with the children this weekend. .. .

Although there was an understandable interest of the defendant from acting as an mother are celebrating the birthday with her sister and I together can, so they tried to Email v. 30.4.2004, with the class so as to bring about an agreement that the 7th week could spend up to 05/09/2004 with the children. However, since a corresponding agreement with the class in this way was not concluded what was clearly in view of the reply of the class v. 05.02.2004, the defendant was bound to respect the decision at the Local v. 20.12.2002 and the togetherness of the class with the kids on the weekend 7th to allow up to 09/05/2004.

Something else was found in this case not even the fact that the defendant probably would meet the wishes of the child I spend the birthday with her mother and sister to, and thus may correspond to the welfare of children. In the present case had been clarified by the decision of the fact FAMG v. 12.20.2002 rights and duties of parents to deal with the children by a family court decision. Upon effectiveness of this family court decision, all parties bound by the specification of the mandatory law, which basically has the power to exclude the granting of dealing committed parents, the perception of the so concretized duty law by refusing the other parent, in his view, may also considerable reasons why the child against the family court system. Because neither parent had the power to replace the ordering effect of the family court system by its own assessment of the child's welfare and making it ineffective. Rather, the defendant would have been required to allow for their views because the child required deviation from the existing family court system by going to court and finding a different scheme.

Since the defendant failed to do this, it has culpably violated the rights of the 1 (first as an absolute right meaning of the 5 823 I Civil Code and is therefore the class liable for damages for any harm caused.

contrast, the action must be dismissed in so far as the class requested by the defendant for damages for non-pecuniary damage because of frustration of dealing with the children at the birthday party of his daughter I on 05/09/2004 in the amount of 3,000 €.

prerequisite for the replacement of immaterial damage pursuant to § 253 BGB is a violation of one of the designated in § 253 II BGB legal interests. Such legal protection of § 253 II BGB is present but not with respect to the frustration of dealing with the children at the birthday party I affected the daughter of the class.

Although in principle an adverse health effect could have occurred by the loss incident to the class, since each is sufficient to elicit or boost a normal bodily functions of the different adverse condition. Such an adverse health effect has been explained by the class but not substantiated, since the class has not specifically explained, in any form should be entered for him by the frustration of dealing on children's birthday adverse health effects. In particular, sufficient for the adoption of health problems not from a sense of mere disappointment or the appearance of anger or outrage, as well as disappointment or anger over a disturbance or demolition a wedding is no claim for pain and suffering can justify (see Palandt / Heinrichs, BGB, 5253 para. 12, notes).

Although a claim for compensation of immaterial damages in the form of payment for pain and suffering without exception, are in violation of a C 253 II BGB the legal interests when a breach of personal rights given. Because a claim for compensation for moral damages is to std. Consistent holdings of the Supreme Court even in a serious deterioration of personal rights. It should only

4823 BGB in conjunction with Article 1 I and 2 I GG - excluding the 5253 Civil Code II - claim basis.

is true, according to of the court by the defendant for the class resulted in frustration of dealing with the children on the child's birthday the daughter of the general right of the L class were affected.

The Court considers that such prejudice is not so serious that it justifies the assertion of a claim for compensation of immaterial damages in the form of compensation for pain.

In this context, consider that the defendant for a class frustration of dealing with the children at the birthday party of the first daughter not aware of causes for the purpose has to take the class in their personal rights or respect him in any way his personality reduce the same, but only out of conflicting interests of the parents, because the defendant wanted the birthday party together with the two children, and design and also on Mother of 05/09/2004 would not be separated from their children.

can not be the non-targeted intervention in the general right of the class considered so serious Given these circumstances, that it will justify the assertion of a claim for damages for non-pecuniary damage in the form of compensation for pain.

A claim for damages because of frustrating the exercise of rights is a general civil case in an adversary proceeding before the trial court (§ § 23, 71i GVG) to carry out. "

Falk Bernau - Judge of the District Court of Hildesheim (FamRZ) 2 / 2007 4 / 2007)


damages for handling frustration

OLG Karlsruhe Judgement, v. 21.12.2001 - 5:00 UF 78/01

first The family courts are to decide on claims for damages because of the frustration of dealing contacts subject matter jurisdiction.

second The rights of a parent under § 1684 I BGB is an "absolute right" within the meaning of § 823 I BGB, the injury can cause damage claims (in this case cancellation charges for a holiday and travel costs).

third The supervising parent may use the contact is not passive disposition the child's left, but has the affirmative obligation to give the child the right of access.



. . .

Diesel Boost Compensator

false statements and details of youth services, teachers and other persons in cases of voluntary jurisdiction - Damages


both criminal, and civil law relevant ... ...
can
In criminal law, depending on configuration, libel or slander under § 186 of the Penal Code are applicable to § 187 StGB.

For the question of what civil rights are considered and enforce the court before which they are, it is of crucial importance, who as the carrier of the school. I assume the answer to my question that it is a state SCHOOLS.

would in this case, a claim for damages under § 839 BGB, Article 34 GG (official misconduct) address. The prerequisite for this would be a culpable violation of an official duty. Such may be due to the untruthful allegations.

if there is one that you can claim compensation under § § 249 ff BGB. It would, however, this requires that you can you quantify the damage caused. You would have to explain specifically what damage you caused.

The claim would be independent of the amount of damages the district court to enforce. Before the district court there lawyer.

The claim against the carrier would be sent to the school. Personal liability of the actors from the case if they acted pursuant to an official duty.

it was a school with a private carrier could follow the claim for damages under § § 823 para 2 BGB, 249 et seq. This would be depending on the level before the county or district court (District Court to 5,000 EUR, 5,000 EUR district court) to be claimed. In this case the actors would still be liable personally.

true in every case, the full burden of proof for all of the operative facts, that is, you have to prove that the person guilty of untruthful This information. In view of this

can prove it to be advantageous if you do the first criminal court against the person, that complaint. The won any of the prosecutor's information could be recovered in a civil proceeding.

You should also wait for the latest court decision, because whereas it may or may not result in useful information. For questions I am

you as part of the demand function at your disposal.

lawyer Alexander Biernacki
Friedrichstr. 171 10117 Berlin

(branch)
Tel: 030/577091220
Fax: 030/577091229
www.ra-biernacki.de
kontakt@ra-biernacki.de

What Do You Need To Be A Mortician Ny

trial observers searched .... Insult ....


PRESS RELEASE - Calling All.

The meeting room must be fully on 03/03/2011:

Thursday 3 March 2011, at
Uhrzzeit: 11:30 - is

The public meeting - 13:30
Amtsgericht München
- Criminal -
Nymphenburger
St. 16 D - 80335 Munich
SS A214/II!

action for libel!

Where To Get Paregoric

Kay's birthday - happy birthday welcome ....


first World Action on 3.2.2011 for my son

Kay My Dear Friends,

My dear friends,

Little Relatives and acquaintances

My brothers and sisters Tern,

in the whole world.

On 02/03/2011 my son is 4 years old Kay. He has been living since April 2010 with his sister Evelyn in the judicial district Starnberg with a foster family. The Mutterhat their own children since March 2010, no longer visited.

The experts from the CCA - headquarters in Bilton. 45 -, D - 81669 Munich, Carola Partale had, with report of 01.04.2009, page 1 - 18, at the hearing before the District Court of Munich - Family Court - Geschäftszeichhen: 554 F 10982/07, 01.04.2009 Mother a "parenting skills" certified with serious consequences, as it turned out has made.

Since my son Kay on 2/3/2011 4 years old, I will ask all of you sincerely to the world of action for my son Kay on 03/02/2011 either an e - mail or facsimile or telephone call or a birthday card sent to the following as:

guardian of Kay since 06/09/2010:

Roland Völk

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

- Office for Youth and Family -

Münchner Str 32

D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519 - 278

Fax 08141/519 - 450

E - Mail - Address: roland.voelk @ lra-ffb.de

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

- Office for Youth and Family -

Münchner Str

32 D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519 - 359

Fax 08141/519 - 450

Former Clerk:

a) Ulrike grain Acher and

b) Erika Hermann

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

- Office for Youth and Family -

Münchner Str 32, D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519 - 359

Fax 08141/519 - 450

E - mail - Address: ulrike.kormnacher @ lra-ffb.de

E - Mail - Address: erika.hermann @ lra-ffb.de

Present Clerk:

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

- Office for Youth and Family - Anita

Reindl

Münchner Str 32, D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519 - 359

Fax 08141/519 - 450

E - Mail - Address : anita.reindl @ lra-

ffb.de related to

a)

social community center Pasing

- Youth Office -

woman Kürzinger

Landsberger Str 486 81241 Munich



social field:

Phone 089/233 - 089/233 96 804

Fax - 37 200 or 233-37351

E - Mail - Address: sbh-pasing.soz @ muenchen.de

related to

b)

Ki-Ta

- Kindergarten -

Freienfelsstr. 3

D - 81249 Munich, Lochhausen

Phone 089/8712525 Fax

089/233 - 37 200 or 233-37351


District Office

first

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

head of the office of district administrator

Münchner Str

32 D - 82256 Bruck

Thomas Karmasin

- District -

E - Mail - Address: landrat.Karmasin @ lra-ffb.de

Internet: http://www.lra-ffb.de/lra/lr/blkontakt.shtml

phone 08141/519 - 212

Fax 08141/519 - 941

E - Mail - Address: buero-landrat@lra-ffb.de

E - Mail - Address: pressestelle@lra-ffb.de

E - Mail - Address: oeffentlichkeitsarbeit@lra-ffb.de

second

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

anteroom District

Münchner Str

32 D - 82256 Bruck

08141/519-207 phone, fax -406

08141/519-550

E - Mail - Address: buero-District @ lra-ffb.de

third

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

antechamber of the office management and public relations agency

Munich Street 32

D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519-395, - 978

Fax 08141/519 - 941

E - Mail - Address: pressestelle@lra-ffb.de

E - Mail - Address :


oeffentlichkeitsarbeit@lra-ffb.de 4th

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

publicity

Münchner Str

32 D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519 - 947

Fax 08141/519 - 941

E - Mail - Address: oeffentlichkeitsarbeit@lra-ffb.de

5th

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

office of the county

Münchner Str

32 D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519-488, -985

Fax 08141/519 - 550

E - Mail - Address: geschst-kt@lra-ffb.de

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

- Office for Youth and Family -

Dietmar King

Münchner Str

32 D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519 - 908

Fax 08141/519 - 450

E - Mail - Address: dietmar.koenig @ lra-ffb.de

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

- Office for Youth and Family -


AL Peter Schmelzer


Munich Street 32

D - 82256 Bruck

phone 08141/519 - 208

Fax 08141/519 - 450

E - Mail - Address: peter.schmelzer @ lra-


ffb.de 6th

District Office Fürstenfeldbruck

Münchner Str

32 D - 82256 Bruck

switchboard: 08141/519 - 0

Telephone Information Service Center: 08141/519 - 999

Fax 08141/519 - 450

E - Mail - Address: poststelle@lra-ffb.de

A God reward from Münchenan to ALL, the city of dreams and the world city of the seven beers, by and with



Joachim Hinz

- father retired (= VaD) since 20.12.2007 -